Stop losing pieces in Xiangqi: a five-check routine
Use concrete examples of horse legs, elephant eyes, cannon screens and general safety to build a repeatable routine before each move.
On this page
Separate a legal move from a good move
Beginners often notice their own threat and miss the opponent’s reply. Before committing to a candidate, ask five questions: does the piece move that way, is the route clear, is your general safe, can the piece be taken without adequate compensation, and what protection does it abandon?
The routine becomes faster with practice. Slow down when a position changes sharply. A move accepted by the board is legal under its rules; it is not necessarily strategically good. This checklist is a way to catch explainable mistakes, not a promise to win or a substitute for calculation.
Locate the horse’s actual leg square
Coordinates run A–I left to right and 1–10 top to bottom. For a horse on E5 moving to G4, the two-intersection component is horizontal, so its leg is F5—not F4 or G5. Any piece on F5 blocks that move. For E5–F3, the long component is vertical and the leg is E4.
Find the first orthogonal step in the long direction. Then check the destination separately: a friendly piece prevents landing, while an enemy piece may be captured if the move leaves your general safe. A supposedly protected piece may be undefended when its protecting horse has a blocked leg.
Try the matching board lesson, then return to your reading.
Open the practice boardCheck the elephant’s eye and the lines it leaves
An elephant moves exactly two intersections diagonally. For Red’s C10–E8, the midpoint, D9, must be empty. Either colour blocks the eye. The elephant cannot extend the diagonal indefinitely or cross the river; with Red at the bottom, its destinations remain on ranks 6–10.
Before moving a defensive piece, compare the board before and after. Removing an elephant from its square may expose a file or change a cannon’s screen count. Placing it elsewhere may create a new obstruction. Defensive strength depends on working lines and controlled points, not simply on how many pieces surround the general.
Recount the cannon’s screens after every change
A non-capturing cannon move needs a clear straight path. A capture needs exactly one intervening piece of either colour. Consider a red cannon on E8 and a black chariot on E2, with only a piece on E5 between them. The screen count is one. Adding a piece on E4 makes it two; removing the E5 piece makes it zero. Neither changed position permits that capture.
An exchange can create or destroy a cannon attack. Calculate in sequence, updating the board rather than imagining several pieces still occupying their old squares. For each relevant line, record the number of pieces strictly between the cannon and its target.
General safety comes before your own threat
Put Black’s general on E1, Red’s on E10 and a red chariot on E6, with no other piece on the E-file. E6–F6 has the geometry of a chariot move, but it exposes the facing generals and is illegal. Moving along the E-file may preserve the separation, although all other attacks still need checking.
A piece shielding your general from a chariot can likewise be pinned. When in check, remove that threat before pursuing material. Giving a counter-check is not sufficient unless the same move also makes your general safe. If the board rejects a move, inspect this safety relationship before assuming its movement rule is wrong.
Give opening moves a job
Without memorizing a long line, you can still ask useful opening questions: can your horses develop, can a chariot reach an effective file or rank, and is the general’s shelter intact? A central cannon or a screen-horse structure is a starting framework, not a guaranteed advantage.
After the opponent moves, identify what changed: an attack, an open line, or an unblocked horse leg. Sometimes a horse gains access without moving because another piece vacated its leg. Study one concrete loss from your own short game rather than continuing a memorized sequence after the position has departed from it.
Review a blunder instead of merely undoing it
Return to the move before the loss. Without viewing the continuation, identify enemy pieces that can capture the proposed destination. Then compare the actual reply: was it a direct attack, an unblocked horse, a changed cannon screen, or a pin preventing recapture?
Try one legal alternative and verify that it addresses the problem rather than delaying it by one move. A short variation does not establish the best move in the whole position. Record the setup, your move, the reply, the overlooked rule and an alternative. Review that personal mistake list before the next game.
Turn the checklist into a short practice session
Start with the horse lesson and name the leg before selecting a destination. In the elephant lesson, locate the midpoint and check the river boundary. In the cannon lesson, distinguish a quiet move from a capture and count zero, one and two screens.
Then choose a library position and examine just two candidate moves using all five checks. Compare with the reference only after making a prediction. A different move may be illegal, lose material, or also meet the objective; “different from the reference” alone is not a diagnosis. The aim is a decision you can explain without relying on highlighted squares.
Pause and test your reasoning
For a horse moving E5–F3, is its leg E4 or F5? Can a cannon on E8 capture E2 across two pieces?
Reveal the answer and reasoning
The horse’s leg is E4 because the two-step component is vertical. The cannon needs exactly one screen, not two. Destination occupancy and your general’s safety must still be checked.
Continue learning
A correction is welcome. Include the section and the source you would like us to check. Contact the editor ↗
